on the campaign trial, Senator Obama has called for about 188 proposals of new spending. What this amendment consists of is this. We take 111 of those new spending proposals and we put them in this amendment. If you look at it with the 2009 5-year budget, it will cost this country around $1.4 trillion. The argument has been made on the campaign trail this will be paid for by taxing the rich. That is not possible. If you apply tax increases to those who make $250,000, or more per year, all you come up with is about $225 billion. That is not even close to what it takes to pay for all these new proposals. What you are going to do is have to cram your hands into the pockets of small businesses and the middle-class families and yank the money out of their pockets and send it to Washington to pay for a bloated bureaucracy. The point of this amendment is you cannot pay for all the spending by taxing the rich.
Wayne Allard: “on the campaign trial, Senator Obama has called for about 188 proposals of new spending. What this amendment consists of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of Senator Obama's spending proposals during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
my amendment will cut the Federal deficit and eliminated Government waste by reducing spending 5 percent on programs rated ``ineffective'' by the OMB and use the savings to pay down the Federal debt. Five percent is the expected increase…
I would withhold putting E15 on the market until the research has been conducted that would assure that motorcyclists... can use it without damage to the engine.
this is a new process. I thank the Senator from New Mexico for his question. This process is becoming economically feasible and certainly protects the environment. I know the Senator has been working hard on this particular issue on the…
If this bill is not passed, the Bureau of Land Management's Record of Decision, issued in February of this year, will stand.