challenging times are at hand. While I believe a full and fair debate of Presidential nominees is of paramount importance, obstructing an up-or-down vote fails the public trust and is a disservice to our system of justice. The Senate must resist temptations to alter the basic tenets of the Constitution. Instead, the Senate must move forward with the business of the Nation and can start by voting on the nomination of Miguel Estrada. Again, we ought to look at the chart and remind ourselves of the key point in the editorials. The Denver Post said: The key point is that there should be a vote. . . . A filibuster should play no part in the process. The Rocky Mountain News says: The Democrats have no excuse for keeping others from voting their consciences on this particular matter. It is simply out of line.
Wayne Allard: “challenging times are at hand. While I believe a full and fair debate of Presidential nominees is of paramount…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a vote on the nomination of Miguel Estrada during Senate debate.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
Secretary Kempthorne also indicates the critical nature of allowing the Department to issue these regulations in order to attract the private investment necessary to develop the oil shale resource. Let me emphasize that this is not an…
I rise today to express, on behalf of myself and my wife Joan, our devastation and heartfelt sadness for both the families and communities that are suffering as a result of the senseless shootings yesterday in Colorado. Every shooting, and…
I have concerns about the science that some people are claiming here on the floor of the Senate. I think that obviously if we are going to have good policy, we have to have good science. But let me say that from the reports I have seen, I…
We all know we are experiencing a time of dramatically increased energy costs. The price of gas sets new highs almost every day, and the price of oil continues to climb. In the face of this, the Democrats in this body think the proper…