I will respond to the concerns that were raised by the sponsor of the amendment about what he referred to as ``loose nukes,'' and from that same report which he quoted, I would point out that in the report it says the probability that a weapons of mass destruction armed missile will be used against U.S. forces or interests is higher today than during most of the cold war. This is a real threat, and we should not be saying we have a higher priority on homeland defense or a higher priority on missiles. The fact is we are vulnerable in all areas. We need to address that, and we have been adequately addressing it with our funding for homeland security. Now we need to take care of missile defense and make sure we have adequately taken care of the threat with weapons of mass destruction through missiles that might be launched. In response to a hearing we had earlier on the need for a missile defense test bed, I will share with my colleagues some testimony by Admiral Ellis, who is the commander of STRATCOM. I asked Admiral Ellis: Do you support the use of the missile defense test bed to provide limited operational capability, yes or no? Admiral Ellis replies: Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Then I asked him a further question: Does such a capability contribute to deterrence? Admiral Ellis says: Absolutely. Then I responded back: Does such a capability provide a useful strategic option? Admiral Ellis says: Yes, it does.…
Wayne Allard: “I will respond to the concerns that were raised by the sponsor of the amendment about what he referred to as ``loose…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing missile defense and the threat of weapons of mass destruction during a floor debate.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
On the Allard amendment, it will codify the current unborn child rule by amending the SCHIP reauthorization reserve fund. Many States' definition of coverage for a pregnant woman leads to the strange legal fiction that the adult pregnant…
last year we were obligated to accept the assurances from the majority that under this new regime, pay-go would be respected, spending would be curbed, the entitlement crisis would be addressed, and the debt would be attacked. Undoubtedly…
There shouldn't be any concern because we are a social welfare organization. We are prohibited from being partisan in our activity.
I personally thank the Senator from Florida for a fine statement. I listened very carefully to what he had to say on FISA, and then his message of hope to the Iraqi people. I have had an opportunity to serve with the Senator from Florida…