I call it freedom in the workplace, not the TEAM Act, because most folks do not realize what that is. We would like for employees and employers to be able to work together, to have teams in the workplace in order to promote safety and greater productivity. There are all kinds of benefits that will come from that. Why, then, are we pushing this? Because the point has been made that, well, this is already occurring. Some 30,000 companies, maybe, have some sort of team arrangements. There is a good reason for it. The National Labor Relations Board, in some of its rulings, and the courts, have been putting a chill on these relationships. They are beginning to stop them. There was one court decision that said when an employee notified the employer that there was a problem with one of the electrical devices, that was ruled to be improper under the current laws. So there needs to be some clarification of this.
Trent Lott: “I call it freedom in the workplace, not the TEAM Act, because most folks do not realize what that is. We would like for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the TEAM Act and its implications for workplace collaboration and safety.
Share
More from Trent Lott
Judge Southwick was awarded the Judicial Excellence Award by the Mississippi State Bar Association, and he was rated not just well qualified but unanimously well qualified by the American Bar Association. This is supposed to be the gold…
But, unfortunately, the wheels have come off in the Finance Committee, in the House, in trying to find a way to come together in a bipartisan, nonpartisan way.
Let me say with regard to the package that was agreed to, the changes, we did work together on that. It was cleared on both sides. I want to thank the leaders for allowing us to move forward on this legislation. It is never easy to go…
I was accused of being a compromiser or a deal-maker. I didn't know those were dirty words.