For instance, the taxability of the CRP income--I don't know how anyone can stretch that to make it applicable to the Marriage Tax Penalty Relief Act. Second, the request by the Democratic leader did not allow for second-degree amendments, or any alternatives, or any option--even side-by-side amendments by the majority. We certainly need to work through that. I still think we can go forward and continue to work to try to find a list of, hopefully, relevant amendments that could be offered to get to a conclusion on the marriage penalty tax. Since we are not able to reach an agreement at this time, I announce that the cloture vote will occur tomorrow unless we come to an agreement that allows a vitiation of that cloture vote.
Trent Lott: “For instance, the taxability of the CRP income--I don't know how anyone can stretch that to make it applicable to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Marriage Tax Penalty Relief Act and the need for amendments during Senate debate.
Share
More from Trent Lott
We are going to start doing things a little differently. We are going to go back and do some of the things that worked.
When you're dealing with 100 United States senators, let alone 435 House members, you're not going to get it all the way you want it. The president's going to have to give some, the president is going to have to show leadership.
You've got to do that every now and then. Even though you might get your little flak from some of the people within your conference. It's called leadership.
First of all, there's going to be an election and the numbers will be different come this fall. And you're going to need leadership from the President and from the leaders in the Congress.