This shows that in December of 2002 there was an $84,250,000 total award in a case under the current California law; a $21 million in January of 1999; a $25 million award in October of 1997 for a boy with severe brain damage and mental retardation because of the anesthesia. It goes on. Here is one for a $59 million total award. So the inference that all you could get under this legislation would be $250,000 is absolutely not the case. It would depend on the economic damages, the totality of the costs, and the verdict rendered. So I just wanted to make sure people are aware that there is flexibility here and that, depending on the severity and how long it would last, it could be a multimillion-dollar recovery.
Trent Lott: “This shows that in December of 2002 there was an $84,250,000 total award in a case under the current California law; a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential awards under California law related to medical malpractice cases.
Share
More from Trent Lott
I think if they would go back to the old way of getting things done, carefully and systematically, would really help them.
I do think that the congestion problem is going to continue to grow until we begin to make tougher decisions.
I can't help but feel honored and humbled by all that has been said here. My mother would have loved it and would have believed it all. I feel totally inadequate to properly respond to much of what has been said. I thank my colleagues one…
I too am concerned about some of the costs we have had at Amtrak. In fact, the last time we passed Amtrak reform, I included a provision in that legislation to allow food to be contracted out. Up until that point, it could not even be…