Almost every signatory to this agreement--except the United States--was granted special transition subsidy authority for a period of 3 years. Many members of the House of Representatives and Senate do not understand why the title XI program should not continue under its current terms and conditions for a 3-year period given the agreements's special deals, exemptions, and transition programs in the billions of dollars for Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Germany, France and South Korea. This inequity in the transition rules is extremely detrimental to U.S. builders were disadvantaged for 15 years while they received no government subsidies in the face of billions by foreign governments. Moreover, without a 3-year continuance of title XI, U.S. shipbuilders would be three years further behind their foreign competition. This is unacceptable to the majority in Congress.
Trent Lott: “Almost every signatory to this agreement--except the United States--was granted special transition subsidy authority for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inequities in transition subsidy authority for U.S. shipbuilders compared to foreign competitors.
Share
More from Trent Lott
We are going to start doing things a little differently. We are going to go back and do some of the things that worked.
Let me say with regard to the package that was agreed to, the changes, we did work together on that. It was cleared on both sides. I want to thank the leaders for allowing us to move forward on this legislation. It is never easy to go…
First of all, there's going to be an election and the numbers will be different come this fall. And you're going to need leadership from the President and from the leaders in the Congress.
I think one of the best infrastructure visions we could have as a country today would be to create high-speed passenger rail service that moves people economically and efficiently around the country. The irony is, as long as we continue to…