a pro se plaintiff has commenced a civil action in Texas state court seeking damages against Senator Gramm based on the Senator's acts of voting and introducing legislation regarding the labor of foreign nationals. The action makes Senator Gramm a defendant solely because of acts of voting and introducing legislation taken in his official capacity as United States Senator. As such, the action is barred by the speech or debate clause of the Constitution. As Senators, we answer to our constituents, not to the courts, for our legislative activity. This resolution would authorize the Senate Legal Counsel to represent Senator Gramm to seek dismissal of the matter.
Trent Lott: “a pro se plaintiff has commenced a civil action in Texas state court seeking damages against Senator Gramm based on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a civil action against Senator Gramm related to his legislative activities.
Share
More from Trent Lott
We do not filibuster judges. And if we were to do that, we would change the culture of this place.
I think one of the best infrastructure visions we could have as a country today would be to create high-speed passenger rail service that moves people economically and efficiently around the country. The irony is, as long as we continue to…
I do think that the congestion problem is going to continue to grow until we begin to make tougher decisions.
I wish to acknowledge the Senator's kind remarks. It was a pleasure working with him on this legislation. It has been a long time coming. I appreciate the active involvement he has had, along with other Senators on both sides of the aisle…