I am very proud that the Senate is going to be taking up that issue this week and that we have a unanimous consent agreement which will limit us to only two or three amendments. One of those amendments is a technical correction, and then we have one by Senator Kerrey of Nebraska and one by Senator Gregg of New Hampshire. We have talked for years about the unfairness of Social Security recipients losing Social Security money if they need to continue working or want to continue working. At a time when we have a need for seniors who are 65, 66, 67 years old to meet the demands of our increased job availability market in America, it is the logical thing to do. Unfortunately, for many years we talked about it and did not do anything. The House of Representatives deserves credit for taking the lead on this issue, and now we find it is developing bipartisan support of Republicans and Democrats in the Senate and an indication that the President will sign it. It is long overdue, and I think it is an important issue.
Trent Lott: “I am very proud that the Senate is going to be taking up that issue this week and that we have a unanimous consent…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Social Security earnings limitation and upcoming Senate amendments.
Share
More from Trent Lott
My recommendation to the Congress and to the president would be, quit campaigning, quit having press conferences. Sit down at a round table and negotiate a deal.
I too am concerned about some of the costs we have had at Amtrak. In fact, the last time we passed Amtrak reform, I included a provision in that legislation to allow food to be contracted out. Up until that point, it could not even be…
I was accused of being a compromiser or a deal-maker. I didn't know those were dirty words.
A lot of it is because Republicans when they start talking don't talk about education. You have to talk about it. You have to go there, where they are.