I will not take much of the Senate's time to express my strong support for the Defense of Marriage Act this morning. It has already been discussed in earlier debate, and I am sure it is going to be supported eloquently by speeches later on today from Senator Nickles of Oklahoma and others on both sides of the aisle. I expect the outcome in the Senate will be lopsided when the vote is taken, as it was in the House, which passed the Defense of Marriage Act, as it is popularly called, by a vote of 342 to 67. Judging from the calls and letters and comments I received when I was home during the August district work period--from all across the country, though--it is clear to me that this bill enjoys tremendous support among the American people. President Clinton has promised to sign it into law. His Department of Justice has affirmed its position that H.R. 3396 'would be sustained as constitutional if challenged in courts.' This is not prejudiced legislation. It is not mean-spirited or exclusionary. It is a preemptive measure to make sure that a handful of judges, in a single State, cannot impose an agenda upon the entire Nation. The Defense of Marriage Act is not an attack upon anyone. It is, rather, a response to an attack upon the institution of marriage itself.
Trent Lott: “I will not take much of the Senate's time to express my strong support for the Defense of Marriage Act this morning. It…”
Editor's note · Context
Expressing support for the Defense of Marriage Act during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Trent Lott
I too am concerned about some of the costs we have had at Amtrak. In fact, the last time we passed Amtrak reform, I included a provision in that legislation to allow food to be contracted out. Up until that point, it could not even be…
We do not filibuster judges. And if we were to do that, we would change the culture of this place.
I also think this is a classic chicken-and-egg deal. We tell Amtrak we want them to do better, but yet we don't offer any reforms, challenges, responsibilities to do better. We throw rocks and say: Why aren't you providing better service…
I was always a conservative Republican and I had very strong beliefs about certain things we should or should not do. But also thought that I was sent to Washington by the people of my state not to make a statement but to make a difference…