Tom Lantos: “in conclusion I reject the claim that our bill does not allow our government to support worthwhile projects for the…”

“in conclusion I reject the claim that our bill does not allow our government to support worthwhile projects for the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. In fact, it makes every possible allowance for such projects, consistent with U.S. national interests. First of all, our legislation makes an explicit exception for supporting the basic human health needs of the Palestinian people. Second, it includes a waiver that requires the President only to certify that such assistance furthers our national security interests. That is not an unreasonably high standard to meet, Madam Speaker, given our need to ensure that such projects do not in any way benefit Hamas, either politically or economically. Nor, Madam Speaker, is it too much to ask that the consultation period be a bit longer than usual--25 days instead of 15--given this unprecedented situation, in which we would provide aid to a people whose government is controlled by terrorists. This is new territory, and we owe it to the taxpayers to proceed cautiously. Indeed, we cannot be sure that the new Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority will not exert control over schools and other institutions currently run by non- governmental organizations. In this unusual and potentially explosive situation, it seems to me the very least we should ask is that our assistance to the Palestinian people clearly further our national security interests. This is our minimal obligation to our constituents.…”