Tom Lantos: “I believe, however, that the amendment would weaken the hand of our Secretary of State in international negotiations…”

“I believe, however, that the amendment would weaken the hand of our Secretary of State in international negotiations that are occurring as we speak. Every Member of this body prefers a diplomatic and peaceful solution. Every Member of this body prefers to have as many nations, friends, allies and others come with us as possible. But to enhance the prospects for a peaceful solution, both the Security Council and Saddam Hussein must perceive that diplomatic failure will lead to military action. This amendment fails to convey that critical message. Mr. Speaker, the Spratt amendment requires the President to certify 'that the use of military force against Iraq will not impair international cooperation in the fight against terrorism.' This amendment effectively asks the President of the United States to certify the unknowable. The initial impact of action in Iraq on international cooperation is uncertain. It may be argued that it will diminish it or it will enhance it. But one thing we are all certain of: Once Iraq is disarmed, international cooperation against terrorism will skyrocket, and international terrorism itself will have been dealt a severe blow.”