In numerous instances, the precedent ought to operate as a warning, and not as an example, and requires to be shunned instead of imitated; but instead of this, precedents are taken in the lump, and put at once for constitution and for law.
Thomas Paine: “In numerous instances, the precedent ought to operate as a warning, and not as an example, and requires to be shunned…”
Editor's note · Context
Paine argues that many precedents should serve as warnings rather than examples, yet they are often blindly adopted as law and constitution.
Share
More from Thomas Paine
But the spirit of the nation was not to be overcome, and it was so fully sensible of the strong ground it had taken--that of withholding taxes--that it contented itself with keeping up a sort of quiet resistance, which effectually…
They had a cause at stake, on which depended their freedom or their slavery.
The Aristocracy had hitherto opposed the despotism of the Court, and affected the language of patriotism; but it opposed it as its rival (as the English Barons opposed King John) and it now opposed the nation from the same motives.
Whether robbery shall be banished from courts, and wretchedness from countries?