We are simply trying to make the point that Yellowstone National Park is a unique environment, it is particularly fragile in the winter, it is a precious national treasure that deserves an extra level of protection. Now, my colleagues want to substitute their own judgment for the ones who have taken the measurements, the ones who have the data. The Environmental Protection Agency said that the original National Park Service study was more thorough than anything they had seen on a similar subject; and the conclusion was, even considering the new technology, even considering the four-stroke engines, that the way to protect Yellowstone Park was to phase out snowmobiles, two-stroke engines, four-stroke engines, all of them. Maybe my colleagues think that these machines, nearly 100,000 of them that go into the park, will not hurt anything. But that is not what the studies show.
Steven Holt: “We are simply trying to make the point that Yellowstone National Park is a unique environment, it is particularly…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impact of snowmobiles on Yellowstone National Park during a debate.
Share
More from Steven Holt
I thank my friend from Oregon. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this bill. We have heard about the nature of this very dirty material that is dug, rather than pumped, and the fact that it will go through America, not to America. Now…
If the gentleman from Montana is ready to close, I strongly recommend we pass the bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
My colleague from Oregon said it well: All does not equal best. The other side evidently is embarrassed by the language in the bill. There are many problems with this bill, but this particular section has some language that they should be…
I have an amendment at the desk that affects line 18, I believe. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair notes that the amendment addresses a portion of the bill not yet read for amendment. Is there objection to consideration of the amendment at this…