I just wanted to address a couple of the points that the gentleman from Ohio made. The first is we don't in this legislation tell the counties how to run their elections. We leave this up to them, and it is entirely optional. There are States around the country who have instituted complete auditable election systems in a matter of months. If a county or a State feels they cannot do it, then I would advise them not to opt in to this program. But we believe they can. Let's leave that to them rather than as the gentleman from Ohio would, try to decide for them whether this is something that they would want. We believe from a number of indications that this will be useful in many counties and States around the country.
Steven Holt: “I just wanted to address a couple of the points that the gentleman from Ohio made. The first is we don't in this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the flexibility of election systems in proposed legislation.
Share
More from Steven Holt
Were it to become law, studies that might be used on regulations to keep drinking water safe or to prevent exposure to dangerous pesticides or other chemicals would be null and void. Let's be honest. The not-so-hidden motivations behind…
This amendment answers questions millions of Americans have asked: Will we stop the government's unconstitutional searches of Americans' stored communications? Will we prohibit the government from deliberately sabotaging the security of…
If the gentleman from Montana is ready to close, I yield back the balance of my time.
The gentleman from Colorado says that this would send a signal to European countries, and as my friend from California makes clear, it would not be a signal that help is on the way any time soon. The natural gas would not come soon, but…