The majority's refusal even to consider the life-altering consequences of reversing Roe and Casey is a stunning indictment of its decision.
Stephen Breyer: “The majority's refusal even to consider the life-altering consequences of reversing Roe and Casey is a stunning…”
Editor's note · Context
Justice Breyer critiques the majority opinion on the Dobbs case for not acknowledging its significant consequences.
Share
More from Stephen Breyer
What is law supposed to do, seen as a whole? It is supposed to allow all people--all people--to live together in a society, where they have so many different views, so many different needs, to live together in a way that is more…
It's not just an election. Imagine you were on the court that decided Brown v. Board of Education. Imagine that you were on the court that – that had to decide, for example, whether President Nixon was immune from giving – didn't have to…
Did you -- did I like this Dobbs decision? Of course, I didn't. Of course, I didn't. Was I happy about it? Not for an instant? Did I do everything I could to persuade people? Of course, of course.
If you're going to have a free enterprise economy then you must have a strong and effective antitrust law.