The majority's refusal even to consider the life-altering consequences of reversing Roe and Casey is a stunning indictment of its decision.
Stephen Breyer: “The majority's refusal even to consider the life-altering consequences of reversing Roe and Casey is a stunning…”
Editor's note · Context
Justice Breyer critiques the majority opinion on the Dobbs case for not acknowledging its significant consequences.
Share
More from Stephen Breyer
We can do it best by helping ensure that the Constitution remains workable in a broad sense of the term.
It may be a political process that leads to the nomination of a judge. And a president may think, ah, I have got someone who will always agree with me. That's what Teddy Roosevelt thought when he appointed Oliver Wendell Holmes. He got him…
I know that my role as a judge is a limited one, but the Constitution empowers me only to decide cases and controversies that are properly presented.
If you're going to have a free enterprise economy then you must have a strong and effective antitrust law.