Now, also, I want to remind the Senators, with reference to defense, Senator Nunn and I have been trying to restore the firewalls between discretionary defense and nondefense, and had we had those in place, I clearly might have been more willing to support the Exon-Grassley type cut. But the amendment to put the walls back under our processes takes 60 votes, and we have not been successful in getting that done. So I do not want to relive the last months of battle on that, but my reason for not supporting the budget resolution is even more simple. The conference report on the 1995 budget, once again, as I view it, sends the wrong signal and moves in the wrong direction. It sends wrong signals to the American public on how to really address the Federal deficit. Last year, the signal was taxes and defense cuts, and I believe I have gone through that. My statement--that we have essentially cut defense and raised taxes as a way to get the deficit under control thus far--is supported by the Congressional Budget Office in its latest evaluation. I do not think that sends the right signal to the American people about how to get the deficit under control. We can continue to reduce discretionary spending, implicitly defense spending, and this resolution comes before us and says while we are reducing discretionary spending, we increase entitlement spending over and above the current policy.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the 1995 budget resolution and its implications for defense and federal deficit.
Share
More from Pete Domenici
I want to remind the committee again, and I will say it to you, Senator Snowe, remember, our package was put together by Democrats and Republicans, so we do not come here starting with one side or the other.
It is indefensible for any of you who think we ought to do good work around here and that we ought to not go wild in getting rid of our defense of our country, to not take seriously that something has to be done to see to it that the…
Might I say, Senator Nelson, I forgot, and I want to second the motion that the best way to get growth in an economy is to have lower marginal rates.
Without the President we do not get it done ought to be the hue and cry from the Congress and the people of this country.