Political Quotes

Pete Domenici: fellow Senators, first of all, it should be understood by everyone that this language which is being stricken does not…

On the recordSeptember 16, 2003
fellow Senators, first of all, it should be understood by everyone that this language which is being stricken does not permit the United States of America to build any new nuclear weapons--large, small, medium-sized, or otherwise. There is no authority in this bill to build new nuclear weapons. No. 2, this bill says that in Nevada we used to test nuclear weapons for decades. Whenever our nuclear laboratory experts used to certify to our Presidents that the weapons were in good shape, ready, reliable, available, and safe, they did it principally because we had a testing ground in Nevada, and we tested bombs to know precisely their efficacy, reliability, et cetera. When we decided to no longer test, we essentially closed down or put that test facility in mothballs. But we knew we must always keep it in case we needed it. We left it there, saying if we ever need it, we can use it in 3 years. All this amendment does--it could be a totally freestanding amendment, if one wanted, but it is part of the amendment that the Senator from California strikes--is say let us upgrade that Nevada Test Site so if we need it, we can use it in 1/2 years. There are few American nuclear experts who do not think 1/2 years is the correct amount--not 3 but 1/2. That has nothing to do with us setting about to build a brand new small nuclear weapon. It has nothing to do with us building a stockpile of new weapons. It has to do with just what I explained and nothing else.…
Said by
Pete Domenici

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of an amendment related to nuclear weapons testing and capabilities.

Share

More from Pete Domenici

Jun 18, 2012

Well, I would just say that, sometimes when we are working on trying to solve this fiscal problem, the recognition that a long-term fix is what is needed puts many people in the position that they do not know how you do that and do it now.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2012

That did not reduce any beneficiaries' benefits, it just cut the amounts that providers were otherwise getting.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2012

That is clearly a part of it, no question.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2012

I want to say to you first, as a former Republican Senator, remember that we put our plan together starting with bipartisan membership.

congress.gov