the Budget Act is 25 years old and 22 times we have used reconciliation, and of that 22 times, 18 have had instructions to change, alter, or amend tax laws, change, alter, or amend programs such as Medicare, entitlement programs. We have done that. It has become an integral part of the Budget Act of the United States. Without that, you could take the Budget Act and say it is for nought. It would accomplish nothing. It would be an exercise in debating and then later on we would have as much time as we wanted on every bill. There would be filibusters on every bill and, as contemplated by the Framers, we would get no budget activity in the United States. Reconciliation includes minimum debate. Without minimum debate, nothing will be done of a budgetary nature for the United States. The Senator understands that. That is why he offers it. The budget will be a shell meaning nothing. I suggest we defeat the amendment.
Pete Domenici: “the Budget Act is 25 years old and 22 times we have used reconciliation, and of that 22 times, 18 have had instructions…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of reconciliation in the Budget Act during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Pete Domenici
It has fallen to me since I left the Senate, for almost half of the time that I have been gone, that I have devoted time and energy to trying to come up with ways and means to help this great Nation get out of the terrible dilemma that we…
We may not know all the answers that you seek of us because we did not have a lot of time to study in detail the more intricate health care issues.
We are now talking about something different. We are talking about the ratio of debt-to-GDP.
I am sure people are scratching their heads, as I am, wondering, why is the President not sitting down with top congressional leaders and saying, how do we avoid this, as opposed to, I am sad to say, the President does not seem very…