I thought it was very ominous, and I thought it was another step in the direction of obstruction of justice.
Norman Eisen: “I thought it was very ominous, and I thought it was another step in the direction of obstruction of justice.”
Editor's note · Context
Eisen discusses Trump's ambiguous statements regarding involvement with the Justice Department and suggests they may indicate obstruction of justice.
Share
More from Norman Eisen
The House Republicans shot themselves in the foot over and over again, first with the so-called unmasking scandal that turned out to be a nothingburger, the Nunes memo, which was an even bigger disappointment, and then their majority…
It's a dubious justification. Cabinet-level officials, including the Treasury Secretary travel all the time. There are a lot of other means of secure communications.
It's crazy that we have a President who is nakedly exploiting the Oval Office, spends a third of his time as President at his own businesses.
Well, Anderson, they're not legal. Unlike when Mr. Trump was occupying Trump Tower, in the Oval Office, the United States constitution applies to agreements that he compels his employees to sign.