I worry about the future of Russia, and they still have nuclear weapons, and those nuclear weapons are not pointed at anybody else. We may have them off target for 5 minutes. All I would say is and then we look at Iran, Iraq, we look at North Korea, look at emerging China, and I would tell the gentleman I think, and if he looks at the program we are trying to fund and sending these kids everywhere in the world, to Haiti, to Bosnia, and to everything else, we are, the military today is more deployed than it has been, and we have cut the money by $100 billion. Now we cannot have it both ways. We cannot ask these kids to go out there and not adequately train them, adequately equip them, and I think it would be a great mistake to cut this $4 billion out in a meat ax approach here on the floor when we have got people who have always been opposed to defense, who were opposed to it during the cold war.
Norman D. Dicks: “I worry about the future of Russia, and they still have nuclear weapons, and those nuclear weapons are not pointed at…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military funding and defense concerns during a debate on national security.
Share
More from Norman D. Dicks
I was a very strong proponent of the C-17 even when Douglas Aircraft in Long Beach was building this airplane. I had a chance to go there when they were doing the wooden mock-ups and when they brought in the load masters, who made it such…
You don't need thousands of these weapons. A couple hundred, frankly, could take out Iran and almost any country you can imagine. So, again, we can't afford to do everything. We are in an era where we're dealing with terrorists, and we…
Tom Foley was my friend, mentor, and colleague in the House of Representatives.
There ought to be a competition. I mean, there is no reason that this should be sole-sourced. There should be an opportunity for American contractors to compete, and one thing we're going to have to work on is logistics and their ability…