I still go back to Executive Order 12958 which governs classification. It prohibits classifying information unless to do so is required to protect national security. Now I do not see how anybody can make a case that this number has anything to do with national security. It is the amount of money we spend on intelligence, but by disclosing it I do not see how we in any way endanger national security, and therefore we cannot classify it. It is almost an open and shut case, and that is why I think the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Conyers] is correct in calling for this to be disclosed.
Norman D. Dicks: “I still go back to Executive Order 12958 which governs classification. It prohibits classifying information unless to do…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the classification of intelligence spending during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Norman D. Dicks
Would you explain--you say here you have these two brigades, except pursuant to article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Could you explain what the impact of this is, the treaty commitments here?
I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Lowey), the ranking member of the Foreign Operations Subcommittee.
I thank the distinguished chairman for yielding on this vital matter, and I completely concur with his stated clarification on this CR's funding and language regarding cybersecurity. I strongly supported the inclusion of this anomaly, and…
It is a great pleasure for the Washington congressional delegation to welcome our newest Member, Suzan DelBene, who had the distinction of winning not just one, but two elections last week. She was elected in a special election to fill the…