Well, let me just say something to the gentleman. I had an example in my own State, a very significant project. I urged the project labor agreement, and they turned me down. This is not the kind of project that we do project labor agreements on it. I was impressed that they made a decision, you know, and I didn't like the answer; but they said we have discretion to either do this or not do this, which is what I think we would want them to do because there are some situations where these agreements do add for stability between management and labor if you have things like, I think, the cleanup site down at Hanford in Doc Hastings' district has a project labor agreement. There was no strike so we could move forward and do this waste cleanup work that's so important. So I just say to the gentleman, I will hope that in the future he will recognize that there is no legal requirement, and they are not requiring people to do it and agencies are saying ``no'' when they think it's inappropriate. I don't think the gentleman's amendment is necessary and I hope that it will be defeated.
Share
More from Norman D. Dicks
I reclaim my time. The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman from Washington has expired. (By unanimous consent, Mr. Dicks was allowed to proceed for 1 additional minute.)
Would you explain--you say here you have these two brigades, except pursuant to article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Could you explain what the impact of this is, the treaty commitments here?
I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Lowey), the ranking member of the Foreign Operations Subcommittee.
It is a great pleasure for the Washington congressional delegation to welcome our newest Member, Suzan DelBene, who had the distinction of winning not just one, but two elections last week. She was elected in a special election to fill the…