reclaiming my time, the key thing here is, we are buying an off-the-shelf aircraft. That means no development costs whatsoever. I asked the chairman of the Boeing Company today what it would cost if we had to develop a new airplane, just in development before we got into production. He said $15 billion to $18 billion, and it would take a number of years to do that. So that option is not good. I do not believe this House wants to buy this airplane from AirBus, so therefore before the 767 line goes down next year, we have got to enter into this agreement, militarize that line, and use it for tankers, which are so critical to our national security.
Norman D. Dicks: “reclaiming my time, the key thing here is, we are buying an off-the-shelf aircraft. That means no development costs…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of purchasing off-the-shelf aircraft for national security.
Share
More from Norman D. Dicks
While I would prefer to be doing our regular appropriation bills, I support this continuing resolution. H.J. Res. 117 avoids a government shutdown by continuing the full range of Federal activities at last year's rate of operations, plus…
You don't need thousands of these weapons. A couple hundred, frankly, could take out Iran and almost any country you can imagine. So, again, we can't afford to do everything. We are in an era where we're dealing with terrorists, and we…
I look forward to working with the gentleman on this issue, and I yield back the balance of my time.
I support the amendment as well, and I appreciate the work of my friend and colleague from Virginia (Mr. Moran) and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro on this issue. There are some reasons why these Mi-17 helicopters are sold to the Afghans. It's…