Political Quotes

Norman D. Dicks: I rise in support of Chairman Combest's amendment to section 303 of the bill. As the committee report makes clear, the…

On the recordSeptember 13, 1995
I rise in support of Chairman Combest's amendment to section 303 of the bill. As the committee report makes clear, the committee intends to monitor closely the use of the authority provided under section 303. The amendment should assist in this regard by imposing a 3-year sunset provision. Furthermore, as the report also points out, this authority is only appropriate in limited cases. The amendment makes clear that the authority only pertains to specific laws designed to limit the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, their delivery systems or advanced conventional weapons. Finally, the amendment states that the source or method or ongoing criminal investigation that the President may delay the sanction to protect, must be related to the activities giving rise to the sanction. I believe this is a good amendment and I am pleased to accept it.
Said by
Norman D. Dicks

Editor's note · Context

Supporting an amendment related to the authority for sanctions on weapons of mass destruction.

Share

More from Norman D. Dicks

Sep 13, 2012

I want to thank the chairman for his very kind remarks. It has been a deep pleasure working with you and your very able staff. I think one of the reasons for the success of trying to restore regular order is that we've had good staff…

govinfo.gov
Jul 19, 2012

Frankly, we don't have any problem with this amendment. I would be very surprised if the administration would give any classified information to the Russian Government. Now, maybe the gentleman knows something that I don't know. And I…

govinfo.gov
Mar 5, 2013

Tom believed in and practiced civility, and bipartisanship.

congress.gov
Jul 19, 2012

Regaining my time, just for a second, I worked to convert the B-2 bomber from a nuclear weapon carrier to a conventional carrier. Do you know why a conventional bomber is, I think, more of a deterrent than a nuclear bomber? Because with a…

govinfo.gov