I want to say to the distinguished gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. Livingston], that the gentleman from South Carolina and myself, the former chairman of the Senate Arms Services Committee, are all people who are committed to deploying a system. We think that a thin system that is treaty-compliant is the right way to go because we think it is attainable. We think it does not start an arms race with the other side, and it will be less expensive. Now, what I said, and I think the gentleman misunderstood me, is that it is crucial. First of all, if we are going to send 500,000 troops to the Gulf again, I want them to go with theater missile defense, PAC-3, THAD, and using Navy ships with the standard missile. I think that is a good approach to defending our troops in the field. To me, that should be the highest priority. Mr. Chairman, when we are sending men and women into combat, they have to have protection from scud missiles and other launchers. That should be first.
Norman D. Dicks: “I want to say to the distinguished gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. Livingston], that the gentleman from South Carolina and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military defense systems and troop protection during a debate on defense policy.
Share
More from Norman D. Dicks
In that respect I am totally supportive of what the gentleman is trying to accomplish. I yield back the balance of my time.
I, too, echo the gentleman's interest in the field of directed energy and solid-state laser technology. With the threats and environment that the warfighter and the intelligence community are facing, the addition of new technologies that…
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 329, noes 91, not voting 9, as follows: [Roll No. 579] AYES--329…
Tom Foley was my friend, mentor, and colleague in the House of Representatives.