This amendment would prohibit the Department of Defense from spending any funds--any--for official representation due to a lack of auditable financial statements. Now, I completely agree with the gentleman on the point that we need to get them to do this. I just think this approach is not the way to do it. If authorizers could set a timeframe in statute--and that's the way to do it--without cutting out these funds when they are entertaining people from other countries around the world. I just think it's one of those things that sounds good, but it's going to have unintended consequences. Auditable financial statements have long been a goal of the Department of Defense. The committee has long pressed DOD to improve the quality of its financial management, and will continue that effort in the coming year. However, eliminating official representation funds is not connected to that goal. And limiting these funds would have damaging consequences. The amendment would preclude activities associated with hosting military to military contacts, both domestically and overseas. The activity extends official courtesies to guests of the United States and the Department of Defense, and upholds the prestige and standing of the United States. The amendment would also harm the military services' ability to conduct community relations activities. The amendment hurts DOD's ability to represent itself to foreign Nations and to the communities in which DOD activities are located.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses an amendment affecting Department of Defense funding for official representation.
Share
More from Norman D. Dicks
I thank the gentleman for his hard work on this issue and look forward to working with him.
I yield myself as much time as I may consume. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the fiscal year 2013 Department of Defense bill. I first want to thank Chairman Young for his very generous comments about my service on the Defense…
Would you explain--you say here you have these two brigades, except pursuant to article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Could you explain what the impact of this is, the treaty commitments here?
I can assure the gentleman from New Jersey that the committee intends to fund those programs that most effectively minimize suicides. And I'd point out that in most of these situations, this money is going to be competitively awarded. But…