It seems well past time to reconsider our sweeping UPL prohibitions.

background circumstances

The district court grappled with none of the history and law surrounding similar cases in the past before ordering Dellinger to be reinstated.

Retiring the universal injunction may not be the answer to everything that ails us.

If human nature and history teach us anything, it is that civil liberties face grave risks when governments proclaim indefinite states of emergency.

Tribes are not private organizations within state boundaries . . . Tribes are sovereigns.

the ball is back in Congress' court

[o]ne can only hope the political branches and future courts will do their duty to honor this Nation's promises even as we have failed today to do our own.

I would tell you that Roe versus Wade decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It was reaffirmed in Casey in 1992 and in several other cases.

Roe versus Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It has been reaffirmed, and the reliance and considerations are important.

Once a case is settled that adds to the determinacy of the law.

The Supreme Court of the United States has held in Roe vs. Wade that a fetus is not a person. That’s the law of the land. I accept the law of the land.