Neil Gorsuch: “Policy changes advanced by judges can be reversed and reversed again.”

Apart from pointing to habitual drunkard laws, the government has not even attempted to prove that any other specific historical principle might justify its prosecution in this case.

Courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency.

As I see it, Mr. Chatrie's Location History data qualifies as his personal property.

That Fourth Amendment test, which the Court invented in 1967, has no basis in the Constitution's text or history.