Neil Gorsuch

the plain text of the statute is usually a pretty good starting point.

As a good judge, you do not approach that question anew, as if it had never been decided.

There is simply no law anyone has pointed giving employees the right to operate vehicles in a way the employers forbid.

It is a precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court.

In that case, the majority opinion that I wrote for the court, I upheld the right of the family to pursue the police officer for damages under the United States Constitution.

It is the controlling interpretation of the Second Amendment.

A judge is there to make sure that every person, poor or rich, mighty or meek, gets equal protection of the law.

If it has not done so, with respect, that is not my fault.

There is a need to remind people how to talk to one another, how we talk to one another.

If I start importing my feelings, if I treat statutes or laws as Rorschach inkblot tests, I have usurped your role.

The robe changes a man or it should.

That would be inappropriate, yes. That is against the law.