I have concluded that Mr. McCuen's analysis is applicable in this instance. Perhaps he has had an opportunity to study S. 4. This bill, in its current form, is not about families nor is it friendly. The issue before us today is about workplace fairness. The bill is harmful to families in its current form. Our distinguished majority leader says S. 4 provides much-needed flexibility to workers. But Madam President, this measure is not about giving flexibility to workers; this bill is about flexibility only to employers or bosses. The 40-hour work week and the protections it affords have been in place since 1938. Under S. 4, these protections are clearly abolished.
Mitch Landrieu: “I have concluded that Mr. McCuen's analysis is applicable in this instance. Perhaps he has had an opportunity to study…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of S. 4 on workplace fairness and protections for families.
Share
More from Mitch Landrieu
And if we don't do that, then basically the burden falls and blood is spilled from our youngest men and women who defend us.
We have a person running for president of the United States again, who is a twice impeached president, who is now a convicted felon, who has said that if he's president of the United States, he doesn't believe that he is conscripted by the…
This is so old and tired. It's been going on in this country forever. And I think people are really getting kind of tired.
Joe Biden understands America's place in the world and that if we're not there, the preservation of democracy and freedom, both abroad and at home, is going to be at risk.