Let me emphasize what I said earlier, that if his appeal should be sustained, there is no question but what it kills the conference report. That is a matter of great seriousness. For no one can guarantee, if we go back to the conference table, what will come out of that negotiation. I can assure my friends on both sides of the aisle that I objected and fought many other provisions, some of which I think they would feel just as strongly about, if not more strongly.
Michael Roth: “Let me emphasize what I said earlier, that if his appeal should be sustained, there is no question but what it kills the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an appeal on a conference report during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Michael Roth
I really want to thank my personal staff, and my trade staff, whether it is Frank Polk, who is always there when you need him, and Grant Aldonas, Faryar Shirzad, Tim Keeler, J.T. Young, and Carrie Clark from the Finance Committee. I also…
But aren't we better off and don't we have a better chance of bringing more responsible leaders to the front if we work with them and do not alienate them?
You are correct. Station projects such as those you described on the Charlotte-Greensboro-Raleigh line are important examples of critical investments envisioned in this legislation.
My own personal experience is that significant progress is being made. Let me give one illustration. When I was there the first time, an individual could not move from Beijing to another region.