We would have to create a new one. The distinguished Senator is absolutely correct. The other point I want to make, Mr. President, is that the 18-month holding period resulted from exactly the same process to which the distinguished Senator from North Dakota is objecting. But I recall no one from that side of the aisle objecting to the 18 months on the same grounds that it is objecting to the reduction of 12 months. So, again, what I am saying is that we are correcting something that was done a year ago. And for that reason, I must urge that----
Michael Roth: “We would have to create a new one. The distinguished Senator is absolutely correct. The other point I want to make, Mr.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the holding period in relation to legislative objections during Senate debate.
Share
More from Michael Roth
I only want to echo what my friend and distinguished ranking member has said about Debbie. We have accomplished a lot in the area of trade in recent years, and so much of the credit should go to the staff who have worked so hard and so…
I want the city of New York to restore my license at the downtown heliport, which they wrongfully took.
Of course, first, I have to thank my dear friend, our venerable colleague, and always gracious ranking member of the Finance Committee, Pat Moynihan. It would never have been possible to be here today with the kind of vote I think we are…
The senior Senator from Illinois is correct and I thank him for his kind words. He is correct with regard to the purpose and intended effect of this section. My understanding is that the antidumping duty order covering these entries has…