The Aamodt and Taos settlements continue this approach and reflect a desire by the people of the State of New Mexico, both Indian and non-Indian alike, to control their own future by settling their differences through negotiation, rather than litigation.
Connor describes the Aamodt and Taos settlements as a means for New Mexicans to negotiate water rights.
Share
More from Michael L. Connor
I think these opportunities are real. They are necessary in a changing climate.
Overall, our goal is to promote certainty, sustainability, and resiliency for those who use and rely on water resources in the West.
I would like to recognize that for over 25 years, the Federal government, together with Indian tribes, states, and local parties, have acknowledged that negotiated Indian water rights settlements are preferable to the protracted litigation.
we need to have a clear definition of waters of the U.S., one that is protective, as it should be, under the Clean Water Act, but one that provides clarity.