It would still have 1,000 net losses in overall staff at SSA, but not as bad as the 3,400 that I would say would be--I do not want to call it catastrophic. It would be devastating if the House mark were to go through.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of proposed staffing cuts on the Social Security Administration.
Share
More from Martin O'Malley
Many of the things we're about to see are going to be totally inconsistent with the republic these tariffs that are going to drive up the cost of everything for families all across America.
At this rate, they [DOGE] will break it. And they will break it fast, and there will be an interruption of benefits.
Everybody who can is going to take that early out, but I think that 7,000 number is conservative.
I certainly can’t tell anybody who to vote for, but I can tell you that the proposals that are coming from Donald Trump would quickly deplete Social Security, and we wouldn’t be able to pass it on to our kids as our grandparents passed it…