There can be no moral justice in punishing for such an act, because, there having been no criminal motive, there can have been no other motive which justice can take cognizance of, as demanding or justifying punishment.
Spooner argues that without a criminal motive, punishment lacks moral justification.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
Why should they not have such an administration of justice as they desire, and can understand?
And he can rightfully be held to no greater knowledge of the law than this.
Since Magna Carta, we have evidence showing quite conclusively that all freemen, above the age of twenty-one years, were eligible as jurors.
And whenever any number of men, calling themselves a government, do anything to another man, or to his property, which they had no right to do as individuals they thereby declare themselves trespassers, robbers, or murderers, according to…