On the record
So that practically a jury has no absolute power to take a party's goods, rights, or person.
Said by
Lysander Spooner
Source
gutenberg.orgSo that practically a jury has no absolute power to take a party's goods, rights, or person.
Spooner asserts that juries do not possess absolute power over a person's rights or property.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
And yet these reasons, which are really no reasons at all, are the only ones, so far as I know, that have ever been offered for this absurd and brutal doctrine.
All those who are not forbidden by law may be judges (jurors).
The presumption clearly is that all were eligible.
Yet the codes of the most celebrated kings are very small, and were little more than compilations of immemorial customs.