On the record
It was simply, that they would neither convict the innocent, nor acquit the guilty.
Said by
Lysander Spooner
Source
gutenberg.orgIt was simply, that they would neither convict the innocent, nor acquit the guilty.
Spooner describes the oath taken by jurors, which emphasizes their duty to ensure justice.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
They cannot claim or expect that the whole people shall practise the folly of taking on trust their pretended superior knowledge, and of committing blindly into their hands all their own interests, liberties, and rights, to be disposed of…
In that case the trial is really a trial by the government, and not by the jury.
But there is no reason why a judge should have the power of punishing, for contempt, any more than for any other offence.
Proud from victory, and with their swords in their hands, would they surrender their liberties to a private man?