In short, they would judge, from any and every means they might have of judging; and if they had any reasonable doubt that he knew his act to be criminal in itself, they would be bound to acquit him.
Spooner insists that juries must acquit if there is reasonable doubt about the accused's awareness of the criminal nature of their act.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
Juries would refuse to enforce a tax against a man who had never agreed to pay it.
They were even allowed to grant pardon to criminals, and to correct by their clemency the rigors of justice.
It would also be making them consent to what they regard as the destruction of their own rights.
The presumption clearly is that all were eligible.