Such a monopoly of food would have been no clearer violation of men's natural rights, than is the present monopoly of money.
Lysander Spooner: “Such a monopoly of food would have been no clearer violation of men's natural rights, than is the present monopoly of…”
Editor's note · Context
Spooner argues that monopolies, whether in food or money, violate natural rights.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
They do not attempt to deceive us, or mislead us, or reconcile us to their doings, by any such pretences, impostures, or insults as these.
For all these reasons, they are not only modest and sensible, but really frank, honest, and honorable villains, contrasted with these courts of injustice, and the lawmakers by whom these courts are established.
They do not tell us that we are the freest and happiest people on earth, inasmuch as each of our male adults is allowed one voice in ten millions in the choice of the men, who are to rob, enslave, and murder us.
In short, they acknowledge themselves hostes humani generis: enemies of the human race.