On the record
So they hold that in such an exigency as they describe, congress had the right to commit any crime against private persons, by which the government could be saved.
Said by
Lysander Spooner
Source
gutenberg.orgSo they hold that in such an exigency as they describe, congress had the right to commit any crime against private persons, by which the government could be saved.
He condemns the idea that Congress can commit crimes against individuals in the name of government survival.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
It is also sheer impudence, on their part, to assume that their commands are at all necessary to teach other men what is, and what is not, justice.
Juries would refuse to enforce a tax against a man who had never agreed to pay it.
But there is no reason why a judge should have the power of punishing, for contempt, any more than for any other offence.
It was simply, that they would neither convict the innocent, nor acquit the guilty.