Lysander Spooner

Is it possible to conceive of a more complete denial of all a man's natural, human rights, than is the denial of his right to have any will, judgment, or conscience of his own, either as to his being killed himself, or as to his being used…

If he refuses to kill any, or all, other men, whom it commands him to kill, it takes his own life, as unceremoniously as if he were but a dog.

It does not recognize him at all as a human being, having any rights whatever of his own, but only as an instrument, a weapon, or a machine, to be used in killing other men.

It no more recognizes his right to have anything to say in the matter, than if he were but so much weight of powder or ball.

It considers him simply as so much senseless war material, to be consumed, expended, and destroyed for the maintenance of its power.

If it have need of him, for the maintenance of its power, it takes him, against his will (conscripts him), and puts him before the cannon's mouth, to be blown in pieces, as if he were a mere senseless thing, having no more rights than if…

The government does not even recognize a man's natural right to his own life.

My proposition, then, is, that there is not a single natural, human right, that the government of the United States recognizes as inviolable; that there is not a single natural, human right, that it hesitates to trample under foot…

It virtually declares that it does not itself exist at all for the good of the people, but that the people exist solely for the use of the government.

All these things prove that the government does not exist at all for the protection of men's rights; but that it absolutely denies to the people any rights, or any liberty, whatever, except such as it shall see fit to permit them to have…

It takes men's property, liberty, and lives whenever it can serve its own purposes by doing so.

It tramples upon any and every individual right, whenever its own will, pleasure, or discretion shall so dictate.