Political Quotes

On the recordMay 17, 1994
I rise in support of the Faircloth amendment to S. 2019, the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments. As reported, section 3 of the bill would add a part G--sections 1471- 1479--to the Safe Drinking Water Act, requiring the EPA Administrator to make grants to States for capitalizing State revolving loan funds [SRF's] to finance facilities for the treatment of drinking water. This new grant program is modeled after a similar one created in the Clean Water Act. Unfortunately, the new section 1477(a) in the bill would apply the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 to the SRF's. Because Davis-Bacon directly applies only to public works and public buildings, it would not apply to SRF's without such an explicit extension. Davis-Bacon should not apply to SRF's; it would amount to another Federal mandate on the States: Davis-Bacon is a standard for Federal procurement contracts for construction--it shouldn't be imposed on State and local decisionmaking about State and local needs and priorities. The Davis-Bacon provision in S. 2019 is another example of the Federal Government giving with one hand and taking away with the other. The bill says that we'll help pay for some of the capital costs of Federal drinking water mandates. But then we add Davis-Bacon to make capital improvements more expensive, more regulated, and more paperwork-intensive.
Said by
Larry Craig

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the Faircloth amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments.

Share

More from Larry Craig

Oct 3, 2007

Senator Larry Craig makes it definite. He is definitely not resigning even though he said he would if a judge upheld his guilty plea in a men's room sex sting.

transcripts.cnn.com
Sep 4, 2007

Arlen Specter is now willing to come out in my defense, arguing that it appears, by all that he knows, I have been railroaded and all of that. Having all of that, we have reshaped my statement a little bit to say it is my intent to resign…

transcripts.cnn.com
Feb 28, 2008

It's my understanding that, due to the violations, the beef is unfit for human consumption. But is it necessarily unsafe?

congress.gov
Feb 28, 2008

I appreciate the way that you have handled this.

congress.gov