I fear this legislation would insert Congress in the scientific process of approving applications that we have entrusted to the FDA. This application has been pending at FDA for over 15 years. We should allow the FDA to complete their scientific review of the product and not interfere with the ongoing reviews. We have a science-based system that allows for complete review. We should allow that process to continue. This amendment sets up a two- tiered, two-agency approval system. That is not good. We know the FDA has already conferred with NOAA regarding the pending application. Basically, Members of the Senate should not put on lab coats and tell the FDA to approve or deny the pending application. We should allow them to act on the statutory authority that is given to them. I reluctantly oppose the amendment of my colleague from Alaska. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Massachusetts.
Share
More from Kevin Roberts
thank you to my colleagues from West Virginia, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and now the great State of Montana. The distinguished Senator from Montana is sitting at the desk that was occupied by Conrad Burns, a Senator from Montana who was a…
if we had not done this, it would have resulted in delays in the 2018 farm bill programs--the one that we passed here with 87 votes--and the ability farmers would have with the risk management tools. I would just simply point out that no…
conservatives should feel no obligation to reflexively support any foreign government, no matter how loud the pressure becomes from the globalist class or from their mouthpieces in Washington.
I rise to respond to this unanimous consent request to call up and pass a bill to make modifications to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. Over the past few months, through the enactment of both the Families…