On the recordSeptember 10, 2015
we all come here to make a difference, and we have on the floor two Senators who have done just that--Senator Corker and his counterpart on the Democrat side, Senator Cardin, who is a good friend of mine. Both are good friends of mine. History will note in salutary terms what both of them have contributed in regard to leadership, perseverance, and trying to make a bad situation much better. I thank them for that. I rise today concerned, disheartened, and fearful about the vote--or, to be more accurate, not even having a vote--regarding the issue before us that affects our national security and that of others worldwide. We have before us the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, an Executive agreement whose original goal was to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed state. In keeping with our constitutional responsibility and Senate tradition, what we should have before us is a treaty, but we do not. Were the Senate taking up a treaty, we could be having debate on rational, commonsense, and effective amendments that would protect our country and reduce the flames of turmoil in the Middle East and in Europe, but we are not. We are voting on a resolution of disapproval, and we may well end up voting not to vote at all--a probability I find inexplicable and outrageous. In the Senate's 226-year history, it has taken up almost 1,900 treaties and only rejected 22, many of which have dealt with subjects of much less consequence.…
Said by
Kevin Roberts
Source
govinfo.gov