I thank the chairwoman for yielding. The Senator from Oklahoma has a good intent, but he is adding in a payment limit on top of two others. It is going to be difficult to implement and administrate from the Department of Agriculture's standpoint. The Senator from Michigan is exactly right. He is limiting programs for which there probably will not be any programs. I suggest we do this during the reauthorization of the farm bill, and then I would encourage the Senator to come at that particular time and figure out what is in the farm bill and what is not, what payment limitation is appropriate and what is not. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator's time has expired.
Kevin Roberts: “I thank the chairwoman for yielding. The Senator from Oklahoma has a good intent, but he is adding in a payment limit on…”
Share
More from Kevin Roberts
I rise to engage in a colloquy with the distinguished chairman of the Senate Rules Committee and the senior Senator from Texas with regard to a commitment made between all of us here. This commitment is related to the [consideration] of…
I thank the Senator for yielding to me. As has been aptly pointed out by Senator Hoeven, who, by the way, does an outstanding job as our protector on the all-powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, we are in a tough place. We really…
if we had not done this, it would have resulted in delays in the 2018 farm bill programs--the one that we passed here with 87 votes--and the ability farmers would have with the risk management tools. I would just simply point out that no…
I am not sure this is the final word. In the Senate of the United States there is no final word, I would assume. But this points out something that is just absolutely understandable--common sense. When people ask me how on Earth we got 87…