Political Quotes

Judd Gregg: I will respond briefly--because I only have a minute, I will have to do it briefly--to the point of the Senator from…

On the recordOctober 26, 2005
I will respond briefly--because I only have a minute, I will have to do it briefly--to the point of the Senator from Iowa. What is happening is that we are suggesting that we should put approximately a $3 billion hole in the budget to pay for heating costs. Who is going to pay for that? Who is going to pay for it if we do not set the priorities here and offset the costs? I will tell you who is going to pay for it--our children are, because we have to go out and borrow that $3 billion. So what we are essentially saying is we are going to take $3 billion from our children to pay for heating costs this winter for seniors and other people who are on fixed incomes. We should be responsible for that here this year, not be passing it on to the next generation to pay that cost through a debt, financing it through debt. Clearly, offsetting this spending makes sense, and my amendment does exactly that. It offsets it in a reasonable way, less than a 1-percent across-the-board cut, less than 1 percent in order to fund a very important program, increase funding for a very important program to assist seniors and other folks who are on fixed incomes and low incomes. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Rhode Island is recognized.
Said by
Judd Gregg

Share

More from Judd Gregg

Sep 7, 2016

I happen to think that if you're going to do budgets and you're going to pass budgets on a partisan basis, the budget becomes irrelevant.

congress.gov
Mar 13, 2013

But there is no question that if you are going to address this issue in a way that has substantive impact on the future of our Nation, the prosperity of our children, and our standard of living, it is the second 10 years, and the third 10…

congress.gov
Sep 7, 2016

the policies behind getting these numbers under control are extremely difficult politically, because they involve very tough decisions.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2016

Why would we do it? Because it makes no sense, from the standpoint of policy.

congress.gov