On the recordMarch 15, 2006
No, I am not going to yield. Your side did not yield to me when you were talking. What our people are saying is we have priorities, too. We recognize that some things need more money than other things. We are willing to do it within a controlled atmosphere of a spending cap that is $873 billion. Within that cap, we are going to offer amendments to spend money on this item or that item, and in exchange for that we are going to cut across the board under 920. That is what it does. That is the difference. We are willing to set priorities and limit spending. They are willing to set priorities, increase spending, and raise taxes to pay for it. This argument that these taxes are going to come out of some nonpenal event to the American people, that it is not going to affect the American people's income, that it is going to come from some corporate loophole or that it is going the come from some Cayman Islands place, is just--well, it is like the Customs fees. Forty-five times we used Customs fees around here to claim we could raise spending. Finally, we actually did use the Customs fees, so we don't here about them anymore around here. Hopefully, someday we will wipe out the Cayman Islands building so we won't hear about that anymore, either. But in the process, you cannot generate enough revenue from doing that to address the $133 billion of taxes that are being raised here. The maximum you can generate out of those items is $11 billion.…
Said by
Judd Gregg
Source
govinfo.gov