It is almost incomprehensible that we have been on a bill for 5 days, that there are no amendments filed, there are no amendments pending, and we cannot complete the bill. Why would the other side not want to complete the bill since they are not filing amendments and there are no amendments pending? ... I really frankly am at a loss to explain to my colleague why we are seeing no amendments and we are still now wrapping up our fifth day of debate on this bill.
Judd Gregg: “It is almost incomprehensible that we have been on a bill for 5 days, that there are no amendments filed, there are no…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of amendments during the debate on a bill.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
I think Dr. Rivlin is absolutely correct on both points, and Simpson-Bowles did the same thing that Domenici-Rivlin did, which was to actually increase benefits to single women over 85, and low-income individuals.
To get this done, you are going to have to have compromise--compromise on both sides of the aisle.
To those still in denial, or even advocating steps that would make our debts even higher, please reconsider.
I think in order to get Republican buy-in on further revenues you are going to have to do policy changes in entitlement accounts that bend the curves in the outyear in a very substantial way, and make it clear that those accounts are…