Political Quotes

Judd Gregg: I introduce, with Senators Ford, Hagel, and Graham a sliding-scale capital gains proposal, the Long-Term Investment Act…

On the recordJune 9, 1997
I introduce, with Senators Ford, Hagel, and Graham a sliding-scale capital gains proposal, the Long-Term Investment Act of 1997. Given the sobering demographics associated with the impending aging of the baby-boom generation, it is more important than ever that laws enacted by Congress promote long-term capital investment and savings by all Americans. Central to this objective is a reduction in the current capital gains tax rate on long-term investments. A capital gains reduction was agreed to in principle in the budget agreement. We have a proposal that we believe embodies a fundamental change in tax policy at less cost. Over the next 10 years, S. 2 will cost $129 billion, while Gregg/Ford will cost $45 billion. We have developed a plan that would encourage long-term investments through a sliding-scale capital gains rate reduction. The plan would encourage individuals to hold assets over a number of years, allowing no reduction in the current rate on assets held for less than 1 year, with increasingly larger deductions to a maximum 50 percent reduction for investments held more than 8 years. This sliding-scale plan encourages investments that will benefit long-term savings and capital--such as providing for a child's education or retirement income.
Said by
Judd Gregg

Editor's note · Context

Introducing the Long-Term Investment Act of 1997 and discussing its benefits for capital investment.

Share

More from Judd Gregg

Sep 7, 2016

Had it been actually a legislative vehicle versus a commission, we probably would be out of the woods right now on our deficit and debt issues.

congress.gov
Sep 7, 2016

In the end, you have to pay the debt ceiling because otherwise the government can't function, and the effect of that would be catastrophic.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2016

If all the nuclear power plants were closed in this country, it's the equivalent of adding 115 million cars to the road.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2016

It makes no sense whatsoever, and it's apparently--certainly makes no sense for the same people to be urgently arguing to deal with climate change and then either quiet or urgently opposed to nuclear power.

congress.gov